Tesla Motors will do well to distance itself from Fisker Automotive as much and as quickly as possible, as they really do have a different tale to tell, Stuebi writes.
A detail view of the Tesla Model X concept SUV logo and grille at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Mich. At the same time Tesla Motors was releasing good news, Fisker Automotive was making waves with its drastic downsizing.
James Fassinger/Reuters/File
EnlargeAlbert Einstein once said:? ?Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler.?? Pundits always pursue the former, but often fail to uphold the latter.
Skip to next paragraph Cleantech BlogA premier site for commentary on clean tech, energy, and the green economy, Cleantech Blog is edited by longtime clean-tech industry investor and executive Neal Dikeman of Jane Capital Partners LLC, and venture capitalist and industry analyst Richard Stuebi. For more clean-tech news and analysis, click?here.
Recent posts
' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Such has been the case recently in regards to the prospects for electric vehicles.? Will electric vehicles be commercially successful or won?t they?? As often happens, there is superficial evidence supporting both sides of the argument.
On one hand, you have?Tesla Motors (NASDAQ:? TSLA).? Tesla recently?announced that it had achieved its first quarterly profit, on the back of better-than-forecasted sales?of its new?Model S?sedan.
On the other hand, you have?Fisker Automotive.? At the same time that Tesla was releasing good news, Fisker was making waves with its?drastic downsizing, laying off 75% of its workforce.? Fisker?s main model, the Karma, is probably unfortunately named, as the company is certainly beset with misfortune these days.?
Fisker?s bad news made more headlines than Tesla?s good news, in part because Fisker has received financial support from the U.S. government, and was thus being?lambasted by some as the ?next Solyndra?.? (In part, also, because bad news seems to get more attention than good news.)
So, why is Tesla doing fairly well while Fisker is definitely not?? This?comparison between the twomakes a strong case that Tesla simply has a better all-around product at a more attractive price than Fisker.
Moreover, it is said by many observers that Tesla has pursued a different fundamental approach to business than Fisker.? Fisker started by designing a wholly-new electric vehicle that looks cool ? and the Karma is by all accounts beautiful ? but only much later turned to considering how to actually manufacture it.? As a result, the costs and complexity of the car ballooned.? It?s a big challenge to source and manage thousands of parts from many vendors.? (It didn?t help Fisker when their main battery supplier,?A123 Systems, had performance issues with their products and then went belly-up.)
In contrast, Tesla focused solely on developing an electric vehicle drivetrain, including the battery packs, and then outsourcing design as much as possible to other companies expert in the car business, and then focusing on making the integration/assembly of all the relevant systems as low-cost as possible.? (However, it?s an?been documented to be an oversimplification?to say, as some have, that Tesla?s initial model, the?Roadster, is simply a?Lotus Elise?with an electric drivetrain.)
Time will tell if Tesla will be a long-term survivor.? No question:? succeeding as a start-up car company is very difficult.? However, Tesla may have turned the corner.
Clearly, though, there?s a long way to go and plenty of opportunities for critics to pile on.? In the wake of some bad press in February, when?a?New York Times?reporter wrote a famously negative review of the Model S, Tesla still must fight the headwinds of skepticism about electric vehicles as a major automotive force.
Fisker?s woes don?t help.? For the too-populous segment of oversimplifiers out there, it?s easy to extrapolate Fisker?s plight to other electric vehicle companies, particularly if they have a reason to want to make the sector look bad.? To illustrate, Sarah Palin piled on by lumping Tesla with Fisker and?calling them both as ?losers?.
Tesla will do well to distance itself from Fisker as much and as quickly as possible, as they really do have a different tale to tell.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best energy bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.
Chad Everett London Olympics Kristen Stewart Rupert Sanders Photos 2016 Olympics TD Bank mountain lion hanley ramirez
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন